Today I read an interesting blog post about social media automation on Shonali Burke’s Waxing UnLyrical blog. As a busy communications professional, I’ve thought about this topic before and enjoyed seeing it debated. So of course I jumped into the comment thread.
When I first read the post by guest author Thom Holland, my mind went to a conversation I had recently with the owner of a local web hosting company. He talked about how he could create score of backlinks overnight for clients, using a tool that spammed the Internet with basically the same content changed slightly and posted to dozens of different places. Really bad, spammy stuff.
So in my comment I asked Thom for some examples of what he meant by automation. He responded quickly, talking about tools like SocialOomph, HootSuite and TwitterFeed. Now regarding those tools the issue is not as clear-cut.
At my firm Strategic Communications Group we help clients engage in content marketing, with the content promoted through social media channels. To effectively help develop content and then promote it in the proper online communities, we need to know the market niche extremely well. Automation doesn’t provide any shortcuts.
Having said that, I use SocialOomph every day to help manage multiple Twitter accounts and to monitor client Twitter mentions. Nothing wrong with that in my opinion. It’s still me doing the activity, tweeting and reviewing. I also don’t see any issue with scheduling tweets in advance — after all the person still has to write them.
However finding new followers based on keywords, without having ever read any of their content goes too far in my opinion. So do direct messages thanking followers — I used to do that when I first started Twitter, then I stopped. A lot of these distinctions admittedly are very subjective.
Authenticity and transparency are coins of the realm when it comes to social media. So here’s my totally unscientific definition of appropriate social media automation.
A tool that extends the range and effectiveness of the individual participating in social media is a good and smart thing. This would include platforms that help manage multiple accounts, monitor mentions and plan out publication times.
Any tool that replaces the individual, or removes the need for relevant, original content is not a good or smart thing. This would rule out content farming type back link development, automated following of Twitter accounts to jump start your number of followers, and tweeting content you did not actually create. I’m also not a fan of ghost tweeting without attribution — I posted on that topic earlier this year.
So there’s my initial take. This issue isn’t going anywhere — what do you think?
Other stories you might like:
- Social Media Giants Becoming More Media, Less Social Social media giants like Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter are not really social any longer, but...
- How Much Can You Automate Influencer Tracking? If you’re in any type of communications role, you know every vertical has influencers. How...
- Primer on Social Media Advertising Last October I wrote about differing views on how social media advertising should be conducted....